Democrats Abandon White Workers

A source of frustration is that very few Whites actually believe that White hegemony in America could or would be threatened in any meaningful way. For them, advocating for Whites is as silly as collecting food cans for Bill Gates or raising awareness of hardships faced by banking tycoons. If you try to explain to them how the very neighborhood they stand in and its landmarks, families, and traditions will be displaced and replaced, you might as well be describing a fanciful zombie apocalypse scenario.

“That’ll never happen to sleepy old Hicksburgh…”

Well, actually, it’s already happened to hundreds of Hicksburghs all over America, it’s building momentum, and it’s headed this way.

Take Postville, for instance…

As frustrating as it is to try to warn people who are laughing at me as I attempt to do so, the fact that they’re still comfortable enough to laugh is a source of hope. They don’t necessarily want it to happen, and may even be prepared to fight with us to stop it from happening. They just don’t see it happening, yet.

Well, it is happening, and it’s happening faster than the most hysterical klansmen of yesteryear predicted it would. According to the New York Times, the Democratic Party is already giving up on working class Whites altogether. According to the report, they’re still going to court White elites and Whites with college degrees–at least for now. This is a natural consequence of decades of uncontrolled immigration and guarantees the end of America altogether. Do I sound hysterical? Last year’s hysterical prophecy is next year’s Census Bureau Estimate, so a man’s got to sound hysterical to keep up with the breakneck pace of dispossession.

Matt "Chicken Little" Parrott

Matt "Chicken Little" Parrott

Democracy is a very fragile institution, and it depends on the solid majority of the electorate sharing a basic sense of identity. Lacking that, democracy becomes a simple competition between two “others” over resources. This unavoidable outcome is happening in the form of the Democratic Party steadily consolidating all the non-White and anti-White “others” against an increasingly White GOP. That’s not to say that the RNC is trying to become White. It’s struggling mightily to avoid it. But this demographic sea change is greater than Herman Cain, Michael Steele, and Marco Rubio…combined. Not even Karl Rove can devise a strategy to save it from becoming White at this late hour.

White workers are voiceless in Washington, caught between a DNC which is increasingly set against them and an RNC which both takes their presence for granted and is more than a little anxious about being too White. With each passing year, it gets a bit more awkward for Whites of any class to show up for DNC events which are more blatant and direct in their anti-White agenda than they were the year before. Personally, I wonder if the Democrats aren’t getting ahead of themselves in abandoning Whites a few election cycles before the demographics allow for it and I’m not so sure about their ability to keep the (non-elite, non-Jewish) college-educated Whites.

See, for all my hysteria, I’m inclined to suspect that the pollsters and demographers who make a living predicting these things are getting ahead of themselves on the rate of White dispossession. Therein lies the gulf between what’s actually happening and what your typical White American has been led to believe is happening. Even I, Matt “Chicken Little” Parrott, don’t believe the sky is falling on White America as fast as the Democratic Party and Obama’s administration are betting it will.

Don’t you think it’s time to at least open your mind to the possibility that we’re being dispossessed? If The Democratic Party, the Presidency, and the New York Times are taking the consequences of racial demographics seriously enough to bet their careers and reputations on it, shouldn’t you at least take the time to familiarize yourself with the issue?

2 Comments to "Democrats Abandon White Workers"

  1. Kievsky's Gravatar Kievsky
    November 29, 2011 - 3:10 pm | Permalink

    In Boston the Democrat constituency is very visible during any election cycle, and they are very conspicuously made of two demographics:

    1. The non-Whites.

    2. The White public servants (police, firefighters) who get a fairly high salary, often 6 figures, because it’s so expensive to live in the city.

    I think it will be very intresting when the white public servants get cut off. I wonder who will show up to home invasions and house fires of Marxist professors?

    http://www.vdare.com/articles/that-sotomayor-decision-one-law-for-frank-ricci-another-for-emily-bazelon

    Seriously, the careful reader can figure out from Bazelon’s article why New Haven’s white firemen averaged higher on the controversial tests for leadership positions: Because, on the whole, they knew more about how to fight fires.

    And why did the whites know more?

    In part, because they studied harder.

    And, to Bazelon’s mind, that’s just not fair. Bazelon is much exercised by the racial injustice inherent in white firefighters knowing more about how to do their jobs. She says:

    “Is this the best way to choose the leaders of a municipal fire department—the best memorizers win?”

    Worse, the white firemen are unjustly learning more about fire fighting because they care more about fighting fires. Bazelon continues:

    “As one Hispanic quoted anonymously by the New Haven Independent put it, the test favored ‘fire buffs’—guys who read fire-suppression manuals on their downtime …”

    To Bazelon, evidently, this is a bad thing.

    By the way, here’s more from the original newspaper article interviewing two Hispanic firefighters in New Haven:

    “The pair contended that the real issue isn’t about race: Instead, they argued that the way the test was designed favored ‘fire buffs’ who have spent their whole lives reading fire suppression manuals, and studied like maniacs for the exam. Incidentally, most firefighters matching that description happened to be white, they said. … Those who aced the test were nerds who read fire-fighting books just for fun, said Cordova’s cohort.” [Latino Group Backs White Firefighters, by Melissa Bailey, New Haven Independent, February 6, 2009]

    In Bazelon’s utopia of racial equality, the whites would be just as apathetic and uninformed about firefighting techniques as the minorities are.

    Moreover, Bazelon laments, some of the white firemen fight fires for free in their spare time:

    “Meanwhile, the [predominantly white] firefighters from the suburbs are more likely to have experience as volunteer firefighters—which gives them a leg up on skills when they apply for the job …”

    The white firemen also are advantaged, Bazelon says, because they tend

    “… to come from families in which firefighting is a legacy. … Frank Ricci has an uncle and two brothers who are firefighters. He studied fire science at college.”

    This annoys the Firebirds, the black firefighter’s association. According to Bazelon,

    “The Firebirds see the family ties of men like Heins and Ricci as part of a network of influence that only white firefighters can tap into. ‘If you look at the history of the department there’s a group of folks, their fathers, their grandfathers, their uncles—they’re all part of this network,’ said Gary Tinney, the head of the Firebirds and one of nine black lieutenants out of about 50 in the department.”

    In other words, the white firemen often grew up in households where discussions of firefighting techniques were common around the kitchen table. Sure, this means fewer New Havenites burn to death—but it’s unjust to more ignorant firefighters.

    You might think that Bazelon would be better qualified to offer advice on admissions and promotion to Yale Law School rather than to the New Haven Fire Department. By Bazelon’s logic, Yale Law School should hire by lottery. Perhaps—just to get the ball rolling—she could publicly offer to give up her position to some randomly chosen person?

    Moreover, this legal writer’s concern about the advantages Frank Ricci garnered by being related to firemen seems a little ironic in light of this Wikipedia line:

    “She is the granddaughter of Judge David L. Bazelon and cousin of feminist Betty Friedan

    So the Marxist professors are already going after those “overpaid, nepotist white public servants,” while being the beneficiaries of nepotism themselves. That should make for interesting times for the Marxist professors in the cities.

  2. Ben N Indiana's Gravatar Ben N Indiana
    December 1, 2011 - 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Looking forward to 2041 when Whites will no longer be the majority, the Democrats’ move is nod to reality: White people no longer matter.

    The irony: Once the White infrastructure is dismantled, who will fund the EBT cards? Who will buy advertising on BET network? Who will send aid to sub-Saharan Africa? To starving brown children in Central America? Underwrite Section 8 housing?

    With White culture sterilized and rendered impotent, where will Haiti-like disasters find relief? Who will prop up failing black communities like Destroit? Who will keep Jefferson County, Alabama and Harrisburg, Pennsylvania afloat?

    Who will farm? Invent? Provide medical and health services?

    When the White infrastructure is dismantled, who will produce entertainment venues, manufacture iPhones and iPads? Provide utilities? Maintain law and order?

    Yes, I said, “Destroit.”

Leave a Reply

3 Trackbacks to "Democrats Abandon White Workers"

  1. on November 29, 2011 at 12:03 am
  2. on November 30, 2011 at 12:44 pm
  3. on December 11, 2011 at 8:53 am